Of the aforementioned, not all of the complete framework, but we can add a few libraries and packages and make them complete. Here we talk especially about React and VueJS, which represent libraries and the “view” layer of an MVC architecture. However, for the purpose of this text, we will use the term “framework” for these solutions above.
First of all, a modern front-end framework must respect the specification of WEB components. In the modern application development on the client side, we need to create our own HTML elements, and it is very good that every framework we take into account supports WEB Components.
The greatest virtue of Angular is its popularity. With organizations considering whether to choose it, its connectivity with Google has a strong impact on its selection. It has a good market for developers. It is also one of the frameworks that, in comparison to the one mentioned here, has a very wide selection of components for creating a user interface.
We have a feeling that Angular too focuses on creating user interfaces in single-page applications and does not look at solving major problems in creating WEB applications. This can lead to difficulties in maintaining the project unless the standards are drafted from the very beginning. At a more practical level, there is a lot of magic that allows behavior that is not part of the frame itself at run-time. This suppresses the TypeScript value to the end user.
If you need scaling the frameworks or needing to match the team at a productivity level in a short period of time, you may need to consider Angular. If the apps are mapped to MVC pattern, you can also take Angular into account. If you are satisfied with Google’s Material UX Pattern, then this is the right solution for you.
2.React + Redux
The biggest benefits of React and Redux are their simplicity and mediocrity. Following the principle is that one thing is doing well, it is difficult to find a mistake when we look at both libraries to achieve this very efficiently.
The biggest drawback of both libraries is not what they are doing, but what they do not do. To make a rich WEB application, many other packages are needed, and once you get separated from the libraries you will see that it is a deeply separated community that has countless solutions that are not easy to integrate.
If you are confident in your capabilities and looking for a better library than a basic framework, React and Redux may be the right solution for you. You need to honestly evaluate the capabilities of your team and organization not only at the beginning of the project but also with the longer the application itself.
The ability to adopt Vue’s section by part is perhaps his greatest virtue. Vue has a concise and reasonable architecture that makes it easy to understand and write code.
The desire to lean on the “view-model” application and application with maintaining the condition can lead to problems. The essence while using this framework is as if you want the code to be important in relation to the rest of the application without precise decision making for a pattern.
If you have a weakly supported application that needs strong functionality, then Vue might be a good solution for you. He has clean patties even for inexperienced teams. Although there is not so much developed the community as other UX frameworks, Vue offers very useful packages that you can put into your project.
The framework is nothing but a parent’s application, integration of some technology and source code that helps our WEB applications to be easier to maintain and maintain. Challenge yourself or your team to look at the framework as a whole, but first, start with the list of what’s needed for you and your organization.
Blog Pictures: Google Search Engine